Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Veterinary Medicine Sciences
Abstract
Numerous microorganisms are present in the cow's reproductive system from an early age. Other pathogenic microorganisms can occasionally enter and become inhabit cows' genital tracts, which can cause reproductive disorders that impair fertility. Vaginal samples were collected from cows in different fields of animal in Baquba city and from Veterinary clinic in Kanaan district during the period of October 2021to January 2022. Eighty one (81) local adult post calving were examined. The collected swabs or (loopfull) were submitted to culture by Streaking on to blood agar and MacConkey agar then incubated at thirty seven Celsius for 24-48 hr.From 81cows, all isolates were examined, the highest bacterial strain was isolated Staphylococcus spp. 75/268 (28%), followed by Pseudomonas spp. 61 (22.7%), E.coli 49 (18.3%), Sphingomonas spp. 46 (17.1%), Kocurea spp. 23 (8.6%), and Granulicatella spp. 14 (5.2%). Lactobacillus planrerum had positive effect and caused bacterial growth inhibition of for Pseudomonas spp., Kocurea spp. and granulicatella spp. While, Lactobacillus acidophilus had positive effect and caused inhibition in bacteria growth of Staphylococcus spp., pseudomonas spp., kocurea spp., and Granulicatella spp. When CFS of LAB was combined with different types of conventional antibiotic discs had growth inhibition effects against many types of bacterial isolates. Key
Keywords
- Ricci A, Bonizzi G, Sarasso G, Gallo S, Dondo A, Zoppi S, et al. Subclinical endometritis in beef cattle in early and late postpartum: Cytology, bacteriology, haptoglobin and test strip efficiency to evaluate the evolution of the disease. Theriogenology. 2017;94:86-93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.02.006
- Galvão KN, Bicalho RC, Jeon SJ. Symposium review: The uterine microbiome associated with the development of uterine disease in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(12):11786-97.https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17106
- Roope LS, Smith RD, Pouwels KB, Buchanan J, Abel L, Eibich P, et al. The challenge of antimicrobial resistance: what economics can contribute. Science. 2019;364(6435):eaau4679.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau4679
- Varghese N, Joy PP. Microbiology Laboratory Manual. Pineapple Research Station (Kerala Agricultural University); 2014. Available from: http://prsvkm.tripod.com.
- Hamill PG, Stevenson A, McMullan PE, Williams JP, Lewis AD, Stevenson KE, et al. Microbial lag phase can be indicative of, or independent from, cellular stress. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1-20.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62552-4
- Harley JP, Prescott LM. Microbiology: Laboratory Exercises. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies; 1996.
- Gossel PP. Charles J. Smith. Edinburgh's Contribution to Medical Microbiology. Edited by JG Collee (Book Review). Bull Hist Med. 1996;70(3):538.
- https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.1996.0110
- MacFaddin JF. Biochemical Tests for Identification of Medical Bacteria. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
- Chatzigeorgiou M, Yoo S, Watson JD, Lee WH, Spencer WC, Kindt KS, et al. Specific roles for DEG/ENaC and TRP channels in touch and thermosensation in C. elegans nociceptors. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(7):861-8.https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2581
- Bauer AW. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:149-58.https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493
- Humphries RM, Ambler J, Mitchell SL, Castanheira M, Dingle T, Hindler JA, et al. CLSI methods development and standardization working group best practices for evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(4):e01934-17.https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01934-17
- Abbey TC, Deak E. What's new from the CLSI subcommittee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing M100. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 2019;41(23):203-9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2019.11.002
- Steel RG, Torrie JH. Principle and procedure of statistics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
- Adnane M, Chapwanya A. A review of the diversity of the genital tract microbiome and implications for fertility of cattle. Animals. 2022;12(4):460.https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12040460
- Nooralden YK, Hasan AS, Wedad SW, Salah NM. Bacterial flora isolated from genital tract of cows submitted for artificial insemination in Balad district. Kufa J Vet Med Sci. 2012;3(1):2.https://doi.org/10.36326/kjvs/2012/v3i14070
- O'Hanlon DE, Moench TR, Cone RA. Vaginal pH and microbicidal lactic acid when lactobacilli dominate the microbiota. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80074.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080074
- Tachedjian G, Aldunate M, Bradshaw CS, Cone RA. The role of lactic acid production by probiotic Lactobacillus species in vaginal health. Res Microbiol. 2017;168(9-10):782-92.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.001
- Alakomi HL, Skytta E, Saarela M, Mattila-Sandholm T, Latva-Kala K, Helander IM. Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(5):2001-5.https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.5.2001-2005.2000
- Yirga H. The use of probiotics in animal nutrition. J Probiotics Health. 2015;3:132.https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8901.1000132
- Seal BS, Drider D, Oakley BB, Brüssow H, Bikard D, Rich JO. Microbial-derived products as potential new antimicrobials. Vet Res. 2018;49:66.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-018-0563-5
)
